|
Not
only can air scenting and trailing dogs be on the same team, they can be
utilized together on a search mission. Utilization of these two
disciplines together provides a search manager with many options.
I
was sitting in a classroom in Maine in April. It was the first time I had been
to Maine and met the good folks at MESARD. The instructor handed out
topographical maps and different search scenarios. We, the students, had
to come up with our search strategy based on the scenario. We were allowed to
ask questions to clarify the written information. In one particular
scenario, there was a point last seen, consisting of two elderly people
missing from their home. They were known to go on walks around the
neighborhood. I worked very diligently deciding where I was going to deploy
trailing dogs and then air scenting dogs based on the clues the trailing dogs
came up with. I sat very smugly in the back of the room, sure that I had
completed the task correctly, and had picked the most efficient manner in
which to conduct this search. The instructor began to diagram what actually
took place on this search. That is when I realized that not only are
there strategic differences between search dog deployment, there are also
geographical and political differences. The instructor had divided up the
areas of probability nicely and deployed generic air scent dogs. When I asked
about trailing dogs in combination with scent discriminating air scent dogs,
there were valid political reasons as to why this team used only air scenting
dogs. Even though I might have done it differently, their search was a success
and resulted in the rescue of both victims. I had not even given it a thought
as to what I would have done if I didn't have trailing teams because in the
scenario, there was still trail scent that could have been followed.
If I am placed in the position of K9 Command, (which needs to become an
official position in the incident command system, which then reports to
operations/IC) I will plan a strategy that uses both trailing and air scenting
dogs. Because where I am from, we have both readily available.
Both disciplines trailing and air scenting, if
separated rather than trained together, should have performance criteria that
is testable to validate the training. If the dog does both, then the
performance criteria is adjusted to test the dog's ability in both functions.
There is one more thing I want to add to the
recipe. For some unknown reason, dog handlers and mantrackers have become
mortal enemies. If you go to a dog class you hear about mantrackers taking too
much time when the dogs needed to be deployed. If you go to a mantracking
class you hear about those #2$% dog handlers and their dogs ruining the tracks
with paw prints. We have developed a search strategy (and others might employ
this also) that couples the mantrackers with the dog handlers. Together, they
are an unbeatable team. The dog is looking for scent evidence and the
mantrackers are cutting sign. Deployed these resources together as a team is a
very effective strategy.
Jonni Joyce
|